WHY AM I A UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST?
November 13, 2005
Kenneth Torquil MacLean
During the last thirty-five
years I have spent a lot of time in England, and I have often preached in
Unitarian churches there and attended them when I was not preaching.
Any American who is involved with religion is confronted with certain
puzzles when in England. In a place
with so many churches, many of them very historic and some of them very
beautiful, why do so few English people go to church?
And what do they put in its place? Though
it is tempting to believe that many Americans go to church just out of habit, I
really do not believe that is so. There
must be genuine needs that are fulfilled when Americans in such large numbers
and proportions of the population go to church, and it is easy for us to think
that those are universal needs. But
how do people in England and in the rest of Europe fulfill those needs, since so
few of them—some say 2%-- go to church?
The only acceptable easy answer I know is that those people are just
different from Americans. Their
history is certainly different.
When we go back behind the question of why we attend this particular
church to the broader query of what is religion, there are plenty of answers and
definitions. I like a couple of
short ones and the longer one that I read to you this morning from my friend
Ralph Helverson. He says that we
all share a “religious impulse” that arises out of the “passions of our”
physical being, and we are religious when we react in certain ways to that
impulse. Paul Tillich, of course,
says that religion is ultimate concern or taking life and death seriously.
By Tillich’s first definition, everyone is religious, because everyone
must have some ultimate concern, something that drives the way they live.
And since I have gone to church all my life and devoted the last fifty
years of my life to a religious profession, I guess I must be religious. But why this particular type of religion?
Why am I a Unitarian Universalist.
The first easy answer is that I married into it.
When I met Harriet Johnston she was working as the Director of Religious
Education in a Unitarian church—we had not yet merged with the Universalists
then. Harriet had attended the Yale
Divinity School for two years, and when she came out of that experience she did
not want to return to the Disciples of Christ in which she had grown up.
She worked for the YWCA in Pittsburgh for a couple of years and then
accepted a job with the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts.
When she went into the Arlington Street Church in Boston one day, almost
by accident, she decided that she had come home.
I had grown up in the Methodist Church and was active in the University
Church on the University of Southern California campus until we were married.
I was a high school teacher at the time.
We started attending the Unitarian Community Church of Santa Monica, and
I felt very comfortable there, both with the Sunday services and with the people
I met. After a year and a half I
suggested changing my career plans and going to divinity school myself, and we
made the decision that day. I was
very surprised, and I was halfway through divinity school before Harriet told me
that she had always planned to marry a minister.
She gave me a strip of cartoons all on the theme of “Never
underestimate the power of a woman!”
Divinity school challenged me to figure out what I really believed about
the usual religious questions and also to decide what I thought the real
religious questions were. And I
found my point of view shifting away from what I had been taught was important
to believe and framing the questions in what seemed to me a more basic,
fundamental way. When I was
in high school my wonderful Latin teacher, Miss Reeves, had told the whole class
that I was cynical, which I took as rather a compliment.
Now, in divinity school, I came to think of myself as more skeptical.
When I asked myself, “Did Jesus Christ rise from the dead?”
“Do I believe in the Trinity?” “Do
I believe in God?” “Am I still
a Christian?” I came away from
that interrogation of myself with skeptical answers.
It did not happen overnight. And
I received support and encouragement from my work in a Unitarian church, but it
was my journey; nobody told me what to believe.
I began, especially after I served a church as a student minister in my
senior year, to formulate different questions:
What do I believe about death? Is
Jesus a significant figure in my religious understanding?
How do I really know what is right and what is wrong?
What is my life really all about?
Of
course I am making this all sound very intellectual, but that was only a part of
it. In the Unitarian church, from
the beginning, I was meeting a lot of interesting people and making some good
friends. It has seemed to me that
when people go looking at a religious community, part of what they are looking
for is attitudes that fit in somewhat with their own, and people they are
comfortable with, people who are warm and welcoming and stimulating and good to
be with. What people I have come to
know in this denomination! Dick,
who spent seven years going up the Amazon River in a canoe collecting plant
specimens and becoming the world authority on psychedelic drugs. Emilie, who often could not sleep and would read Whitehead
and Wordsworth until morning came. Jack,
who left ministry for a while for a day job and taught dancing at night for
Arthur Murray. David, who
instructed two newly-elected Presidents of the United States about health care
in our country. Edith, a wonderful
nurse who said that she specialized in Unitarian gall bladder cases.
Sam, who was called in to put the finances of the Smithsonian in order.
And Janet who is now about ninety-four, who said when I visited her last
year: “When the Poor People’s March came to Knoxville, you asked me to feed
a thousand people, and that was the biggest thing I ever did!”
Rebecca and Lillian, who have been the mainspring of Unitarian groups in
isolation, one in the Philippines and the other in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.
I
could go on telling you of wonderful, wonderful people who have enriched my life
everywhere I have gone in this ministry, and they are part of why I am still a
Unitarian Universalist, but that is not the whole story.
Together we make up a different kind of church, I believe, and the
distinguishing feature must have something to do with religious freedom.
That is what we have stood for in many different settings over more than
two centuries, four centuries if we count the Unitarians in Transylvania.
Like so many religious, social, and political movements in the world, we
started out by opposing the dominant beliefs of the time.
For Unitarians in the Puritan Congregational churches of New England,
what was rejected was a belief in the Trinity—that gave us our name, Unitarian
instead of Trinitarian—and for the Universalists it was the preaching that
told them they were going to hell. They
believed in Universal salvation. The
meaning of salvation has changed for many people over two centuries, but the
basic idea that this is a church for all—not for just the elect, or the saved,
or the born-again—has not changed.
That
leads me to the inevitable question: when strangers discover that I am a
Unitarian Universalist minister, they often ask, “Oh, what do Unitarian
Universalists believe?” It seems
like a reasonable question until you wonder, as you balance an hors d’oeuvre
and a glass of wine, where to begin. Do
you give them the history? Do you
start by talking of Christianity? Do
you tell them the things we don’t believe?
Do you tell them about the people who died for rejecting certain beliefs
in Europe? It was an impossible
dilemma until I fashioned my two-word response:
When they ask, “What do Unitarian Universalists believe?” I say,
“About what?” The truth is that
there are just a couple of ideas that I can say with confidence just about all
Unitarian Universalists will accept” human
dignity and the democratic method of making decisions.
Most of our stance on basic issues flows from those two principles.
Our commitment to human dignity meant that we were early involved in the
civil rights struggle; the feminist revolution; and the movement for gay rights
and equality in civil marriage. Most
but not all Unitarian Universalists believe that women should make the decision
whether or not to have an abortion without interference from the state.
These
issues tend to be dominant over such questions as what happened two thousand
years ago? What do we believe about
Jesus? Are we Christians? It is clear that our roots are firmly in the Protestant
Reformation, more Calvinist than Lutheran, more Puritan than evangelical, and
more Congregational than Presbyterian. But,
like the original Puritan churches of New England, we have no hierarchy, no
bishops, no authority over the local church, and no creed that everyone must
accept to join. That means that we
can, on occasion, be radical. Most
of the time, we are not.
Then are we
really a religion? Are we spiritual? My
response to the first question is that by the definitions I have offered:
“being religious means asking passionately the questions of the meaning of our
existence and being willing to accept answers, even when the answers hurt,” we
are religious. Are we spiritual?
I like the definition of spirituality that came from a sermon delivered
by Alida De Coster, who was my Associate Minister: “Whatever summons us to
transform the world into ever wider channels of justice and of love—this is
spirituality.” We try to do our
part. When we join a church, we are
acknowledging that religion is not simply an individual matter.
Whatever we believe about ultimate questions, whatever we feel we are
called to do, we cannot do it alone. Together
we have a better chance of transforming some part of the world, especially when
we join our efforts to larger groups, focused on the great needs of people near
and far. This church does that, and
it is what makes me proud to be the minister of the Unitarian Universalist
Church of the Desert!
I
spoke with Ric Masten yesterday. He
is an old friend of long standing who has had a great impact on our denomination
through his singing, his speaking, his poetry.
He is the only Troubadour who has received ministerial fellowship in our
denomination. For several years he
has been fighting cancer, but he seems to be doing pretty well.
I must write and tell him that he wrote the hymn that we sing best: Let
it be a dance! Let it.